Rich vs. Famous
Have you set a goal for your company this year?
If you’re like most business owners, you’re striving for an increase in your annual sales. It’s natural to want your company to be bigger because that’s what everyone around us seems to celebrate.
Magazines profile the fastest growing companies, industry associations celebrate their largest members, and bigger seems to be better in the eyes of just about every business pundit with a microphone.
But growth can come at a steep price and can even detract from your ability to build your personal wealth.
The Contrasting Exits of Michael Arrington
For example, let’s take a look at an entrepreneur named Michael Arrington. Arrington started Achex in 1999. It helped facilitate payments in the early days of the internet, and Arrington was focused on growing it. He accepted two rounds of outside capital to fund the company’s expansion.
Achex was ultimately sold to First Data Corporation for $32 million in 2001. Unfortunately,
because Arrington had been focused on growth above all else, he had not only raised two rounds of financing but also reduced his personal stake in the company down to next to nothing. As he told Business Insider, "When I started my first company, Achex, we raised $18 million in venture capital in 2000 from DFJ. The company later sold for $32 million, but due to a 2x liquidity preference (common in those days), the founders essentially got nothing, just a few hundred thousand dollars to not block the deal."
Arrington then went on to start the technology blogging website TechCrunch in 2005. This time Arrington wanted to grow the business, but not at the expense of his equity. Instead, they grew the company within their means and funded the business largely out of cash flow. Arrington still owned 80% of the company, according to Business Insider, when he sold it for approximately $30 million.
Apparently Arrington had learned his lesson—growth is good, but not at the expense of all else.
The Alternative to Growth at All Costs
The alternative to focusing on sales growth as your primary objective is to focus on the value of your equity within your company. Growth will have a positive impact on your company’s value, but your growth rate is only one of the eight drivers that impact what your company is worth. As you build your business, you will be faced with many forks in the road where growth may come at the expense of both your company’s value, and your personal wealth. For example:
- You may have to dilute your personal stake in the company by taking on outside capital. Depending on the return your investors are looking for, and the performance of your company after you take on outside investors, your smaller slice of the larger pie may be worth less than a larger slice of a smaller pie.
- Cross selling your largest customer more products and services may be a relatively easy way to grow your top line, but if they already represent more than 15% of your sales, the extra revenue may dilute the value of your company because acquirers discount companies with too much customer concentration.
- Giving lazy customers 90 days to pay may keep them buying, but those charitable payment terms may detract from the value of your business because an acquirer will have to fund your working capital.
- You could choose to invest your sales and marketing resources into winning a big, one-time project that would boost your sales but this may not boost the value of your business, which may be more positively impacted by a smaller amount of recurring revenue.
Growth is important and how big your company can get is one of the eight drivers of your company’s value. But growth is only one of eight factors—to learn about the other seven, get your Value Builder Score.
or
Recent articles for you
Value Builder Analytics, drawing on proprietary data from over 80,000 business owners, found that companies that can run without the owner for at least three months are twice as likely to receive an acquisition offer above 6x EBITDA. The concept is simple. The execution? Not so much. Take Kristie Shifflette for example. She was an early master franchisee with Orangetheory Fitness, a one-hour, coach-led workout that uses heart rate zones to boost calorie burn during and after exercise. When she opened her first location, she did it all—marketing, hiring, payroll, and even handling construction headaches. It worked but only because she was working constantly. As she expanded, things started to break. With two locations, she was stretched. At three, it became clear: The model only worked when Kristie was the model. She knew she needed to change. Kristie stopped focusing on being in the business and started focusing on building the business. From Operator to Owner Kristie started documenting everything. From pre-sale processes to day-to-day studio operations, Kristie developed detailed playbooks that codified exactly how her Orangetheory locations should run—without her. She created a compensation structure for studio managers that gave them ownership over their results: modest base salaries paired with meaningful bonuses tied to net member growth and total revenue. Top-performing managers could double their pay, and they were treated like mini-CEOs with full responsibility for their studio’s performance. By the time she sold her business, Kristie had built a company with 13 locations generating well north of $10 million in annual revenue. Some of her top-performing studios, like the Chapel Hill location, were bringing in revenue of $2 million a year, with EBITDA margins around 40%. Kristie’s story includes an important lesson: Make yourself less essential, and your business becomes more valuable. If you’re still the one opening the door in the morning and locking up at night—literally or metaphorically—it’s worth asking: What would break if I stepped away for 90 days? Start there. Whether it’s building a playbook, empowering your team, or simply learning to let go, taking even one step toward reducing your involvement makes your company not just more valuable but more enjoyable to own.
For business owners considering their endgame, learning what makes a company valuable can feel overwhelming. Buyers prioritize factors like recurring revenue, a differentiated product or service, and a leadership team that operates independently from the owner. If a business doesn’t check every box, it can seem as though selling is perpetually just out of reach. But perfection is not a prerequisite for a sale. While improving the key drivers of value is important, an imperfect business can still be highly desirable to the right buyer. In fact, some acquirers actively look for businesses with fixable flaws because they see an opportunity to increase value. Blake Hutchison on Why Imperfections Can Be to an Acquirer’s Advantage Blake Hutchison, CEO of Flippa, has witnessed thousands of business acquisitions. Flippa is an online marketplace where business owners can buy and sell companies, particularly small to mid-sized digital businesses. The platform connects sellers with buyers looking for opportunities to grow or optimize an acquisition. In a recent Built to Sell Radio interview, Hutchison explained that many business owners assume their company won’t attract buyers because it has shortcomings. In reality, most acquirers aren’t looking for perfection—they’re looking for potential. Many buyers have a strategic advantage, whether it’s a strong distribution network, operational expertise, or access to capital, that allows them to take an imperfect business and make it more valuable. A prime example of this is the acquisition of PetCoach. How PetCoach Turned an Imperfection into a Selling Point PetCoach, co-founded by Brock Weatherup, was a two-sided marketplace designed to connect pet owners with veterinarians. The challenge for any marketplace business is keeping both sides in balance—generating enough demand from pet owners while ensuring there are enough veterinarians to meet that demand. PetCoach had built a strong product, but it lacked a broad distribution channel to acquire pet owners at scale. Without a solution, growth would remain limited. Instead of seeing this as a dealbreaker, Weatherup positioned it as an opportunity for the right buyer. That buyer was Petco. With more than 1,500 locations across the U.S., Mexico, and Puerto Rico, Petco had access to millions of pet owners. By acquiring PetCoach, Petco could instantly expand its offerings while solving PetCoach’s biggest challenge. Weatherup didn’t need to fix the scalability issue before selling. He needed to find an acquirer for whom the business’s weakness was actually a competitive advantage. Your Business Has Value—Even if It’s Not Perfect This doesn’t mean business owners should ignore the fundamentals of value creation. Strengthening factors like recurring revenue, customer retention, and operational efficiency will always increase a company’s attractiveness. However, not every issue needs to be resolved before an exit. Instead of viewing imperfections as obstacles, business owners should consider how an acquirer might perceive them: A company struggling with customer acquisition may be a great fit for a buyer with an established customer base. A business with inefficient operations might attract an acquirer with expertise in streamlining processes. A company overly dependent on its owner could be appealing to a buyer with a strong leadership team ready to step in. As Blake Hutchison explains, acquirers are often looking for businesses where they can add value. The key is to position the company in a way that highlights its strengths while framing its imperfections as untapped potential. The right acquirer won’t see weaknesses as dealbreakers—they’ll see them as opportunities.
Supplier risk can erode the value of your company. When a potential acquirer examines your business, they look for red flags. A major one: relying too heavily on a single supplier—whether that’s a sole raw material provider or a platform like Amazon that controls your primary sales channel. If that key supplier vanishes or changes terms, your profits might vanish as well. This risk often leads to lower valuations in the eyes of buyers. Why Supplier Risk Hurts Valuation Over-dependence on one supplier—or on a single selling channel—makes you vulnerable. Buyers don’t like gambling on a business that hinges on factors outside the owner’s control. If an online marketplace tweaks its algorithm or suspends your account, your revenue may plummet. Acquirers see this fragility and adjust their offer downward. Adi Gullia’s Diversification Example Entrepreneur Adi Gullia saw this firsthand. He built his beauty brand, Grace & Stella, on Amazon’s platform. At first, it looked like a goldmine—his foot-peeling mask soared to $100,000 in monthly sales within nine months. Yet Adi recognized the risk. He knew Amazon could change rules or restrict listings at any moment, putting his entire business at risk. Instead of waiting for that to happen, Adi expanded. He forged relationships with subscription box partners to reach new customers outside Amazon’s control. Next he launched his own ecommerce site, selling directly to consumers. Adi also ventured into retail, signing a major deal with Target. These partnerships allowed him to diversify his revenue streams and build a more resilient business. Retailers like Target appreciated Grace & Stella’s success on Amazon, which served as proof of demand. By reducing his dependence on any single channel, Adi created a business that acquirers found far more appealing. The Impact on Valuation When it came time to sell, Adi’s diversification efforts paid off. His company fetched a valuation of 5.8 times EBITDA—a significant premium over what a typical Amazon reseller might expect. Most Amazon-only brands are valued at three to four times EBITDA, reflecting the higher risks tied to their reliance on the platform. Buyers of Amazon-centric businesses worry about potential account suspensions, de-listings, or increased competition driving down margins. Adi’s diversified revenue streams mitigated these risks, making his business more stable and attractive to acquirers. Practical Steps to Lower Supplier Risk 1. Add Channels : If you rely on one marketplace, consider starting your own ecommerce store. Test alternative platforms or retail partners. 2. Secure Multiple Suppliers : If raw materials come from one producer, find a backup or two. Even if your costs rise slightly, you’re buying peace of mind. 3. Build Direct Relationships : Capture customer data through your own site. Invest in ways to reach buyers directly—email, social media, subscriptions—so no single platform can cut you off from your audience. Conclusion Supplier risk is a value killer. Buyers pay less for a company balanced on a single weak pillar. Don’t let one supplier or one platform control your future. Take a page from Adi Gullia’s playbook. By branching out to retail with Target, leveraging subscription boxes, and launching an ecommerce site, he reduced his supplier risk. These moves not only stabilized his business but also helped him command a premium valuation. At 5.8 times EBITDA, Adi’s sale was far above the norm for Amazon resellers—proof that diversification strengthens both your business and its ultimate value.
