Selling A Business During A Divorce

Information on the process of selling a business during a divorce from an expert.

Mr. Smith owns a few laundromats. He’s owned them for 15 years. He’s been married for 19 years. For a few years now Mr. Smith has thought about selling them. He’s contacted a couple of business brokers and decided First Choice would be his choice if he decided to sell. 


His wife has filed for a divorce, which forces Mr. Smith’s hand.  He now must decide to sell the laundromats or value them and purchase them from his spouse by pay for half of the value. 


We asked Las Vegas divorce attorney Rock Rocheleau to help us and Mr. smith understand Mr. Smith’s options. 


Nevada is a community property state. Which means during a divorce all the property and assets acquired during the marriage are valued and divided evenly.  With a business, like a home, the value can be based on an appraisal or allow the home to be sold. By allowing the business to be sold by a business broker, Mr. Smith is stating the value should be what the market will pay.  This makes for the easiest solution. But what if Mr. Smith wanted to keep the laundromats?

How Do You Determine the Value of a Business?


There are three main approaches used in determining the value of a business: These three approaches are used when the business is not actually being sold in the open market. 


  • Market-Based Approach . Compares the business to other similar businesses that have sold.  Using this data, a value is assigned.  Similar to how a home is appraised or valued. 
  • Asset-Based Approach . The tangible assets of the business are given a fair market value and added up. This is similar to an asset sell of a business except the goodwill of the business or customer base is not considered. 
  • Income-Based Approach . Assesses the present value of the business based future earnings. This is the most common approach.


My first impression is it would be best for Mr. Smith to hire First Choice Business Brokers to sell the business. This way there is no guessing at what the proper value is. But Mr. Smith may want a business to continue running after the divorce. In that case, the common valuation approaches should be reviewed and the best one chosen.


Market Approach to Valuing a Business


The Market Approach uses similar methods that are used by real estate agents when they determine the value of a property. The sale price of other similar businesses that have been recently sold is compared. The evaluator then assigns a fair market value of the community property business based on the price range of similar businesses.

The problem is in finding businesses that have sold that are truly comparable. The selling price for these businesses may have been influenced by unknown factors, such as:


  • The motivation for the sale
  • Market trends
  • The business sold may have been discounted for some unrevealed reason, so the sale is not truly comparable.
  • Other comparisons may not be accurate, such as the size of the business, the number of employees, and annual profits.
  • Intangible assets, or the lack thereof, may have affected the sale
  • There may have been no such similar businesses sold, forcing the evaluator to look for a broader business niche. For example, a business that specifically sells custom mufflers for eco-friendly vehicles may have to be valuated with a broader vehicle parts market. As a result, these valuations could considerably inflate or devalue the businesses’ actual worth.


Because of all these factors, the Market Approach is far from accurate in dividing the community property business between the two spouses during a divorce.


Asset Approach to Valuing a Business


The asset approach method may work well for businesses that have value based on tangible assets like real estate, equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. In the asset approach, an appraiser adds up all the assets and subtracts the liabilities.

Unfortunately, this is not as easy as it sounds. Most businesses have both tangible and intangible assets. An intangible asset refers to things like intellectual property, business contracts, and goodwill. The Asset Approach does not take these factors into account when assigning a value.


For professional practices whose value relies on these intangible assets, the asset approach is usually not the best valuation method.


Income Approach to Valuing a Business


The Income Approach uses different mathematical approaches based on cash flow. The evaluator reviews the history of the specific business and compares its profits to other similar businesses. Risks of failure are also considered. All these mathematical approaches convert expected future profits into a present-day value.


The downside is that the value is based on a prediction rather than the current standing value. It cannot guarantee the assigned value will match the businesses’ future value. This can leave one or both partners shorted in the long term.


For Mr. Smith he should hire an expert to value the business based on the income approach, while at the same time hiring a business broker to look at what the laundromats would sell for on the open market.  This way Mr. Smith can choose which avenue produces the most money for him and his wife to split. 

Recent Articles For You

By Kim Santos February 21, 2025
The other day I was speaking with a successful CEO in his fifties who runs a heating and air conditioning company generating eight million dollars in revenue and over one million dollars in profit before tax. Even though he was tired and nearing burnout, he was planning to wait another five to seven years before selling his business because he “wanted to sell at the peak of the next economic cycle.” On the surface, his rationale seems to make sense. If you speak with mergers and acquisitions professionals, they’ll tell you that an economic cycle can impact valuations by up to “two turns,” which means that a business selling for five times earnings at the peak of an economic cycle may go for as low as three times earnings at a low point in the economy. The problem is, when you sell your business, you have to do something with the money you receive, which usually means buying into another asset class that is being affected by the same economy. Let’s say, for example, you had a business generating $100,000 in pre-tax profit in an industry that trades between three times earnings and five times earnings, depending on the point in the economic cycle. Furthermore, let’s imagine you sat stealthy on the sideline until the economy reached the absolute peak and sold your business for $500,000 (five times your pre-tax profit) in October 2007. You took your $500,000 and bought into a Dow Jones index fund when it was trading above 14,000. Eighteen months later – after the Dow Jones had dropped to 6,547.05– you’d be left with less than half of your money. Even though you cleverly waited till the economic peak, by March 9, 2009, you would have effectively sold your business for less than 2.5 times earnings. The inverse is also true. Let’s say you waited “too long” and sold the same business in March 2009. And because you were at the lowest possible point in the economic cycle, you only got three times earnings: $300,000. Notice that’s 20% more than if you’d sold at the peak and bought an index fund at the top of the market. Just like when you sell your house in a good real estate market, unless you’re downsizing, you usually buy into an equally frothy market. Which is why timing the sale of your business on external economic cycles is usually a waste of energy. External vs. internal economic cycles Instead, I’d recommend timing the sale of your business when internal economic factors are all pointing in the right direction: employees are happy, revenue and profits are on an upward trend, and there is still lots of market share for an acquirer to capture. When internal economic factors are pointing up, you’ll fetch a price at the top end of what the market is paying for businesses like yours right now, which means that – for good or bad – you get to use your newfound cash and buy into the same economic market you’re selling out of.
By Kim Santos February 20, 2025
In our experience, your age has a big effect on your attitude towards your business and how you feel about one day getting out. Here's what we have found: Business owners between 25 and 46 years old Twenty- and thirty-something business owners grew up in an age where job security did not exist. They watched as their parents got downsized or packaged off into early retirement, and that caused a somewhat jaded attitude towards the role of a business in society. Business owners in their 20’s and 30’s generally see their companies as means to an end and most expect to sell in the next five to ten years. Similar to their employed classmates who have a new job every three to five years; business owners in this age group often expect to start a few companies in their lifetime. Business owners between 47 and 65 years old Baby Boomers came of age in a time where the social contract between company and employee was sacrosanct. An employee agreed to be loyal to the company, and in return, the company agreed to provide a decent living and a pension for a few golden years. Many of the business owners we speak with in this generation think of their company as more than a profit center. They see their business as part of a community and, by extension, themselves as a community leader. To many boomers, the idea of selling their company feels like selling out their employees and their community, which is why so many CEO’s in their fifties and sixties are torn. They know they need to sell to fund their retirement, but they agonize over where that will leave their loyal employees. Business owners who are 65+ Older business owners grew up in a time when hobbies were impractical or discouraged. You went to work while your wife tended to the kids (today, more than half of businesses are started by women, but those were different times), you ate dinner, you watched the news and you went to bed. With few hobbies and nothing other than work to define them, business owners in their late sixties, seventies and eighties feel lost without their business, which is why so many refuse to sell or experience depression after they do. Of course, there will always be exceptions to general rules of thumb but we have found that – more than your industry, nationality, marital status or educational background – your birth certificate defines your exit plan.
By Kim Santos February 19, 2025
Doctors in the developing world measure their progress not by the aggregate number of children who die in childbirth but by the infant mortality rate, a ratio of the number of births to deaths. Similarly, baseball’s leadoff batters measure their “on-base percentage” – the number of times they get on base as a percentage of the number of times they get the chance to try. Acquirers also like tracking ratios and the more ratios you can provide a potential buyer, the more comfortable they will get with the idea of buying your business. Better than the blunt measuring stick of an aggregate number, a ratio expresses the relationship between two numbers, which gives them their power. If you’re planning to sell your company one day, here’s a list of seven ratios to start tracking in your business now: 1. Employees per square foot By calculating the number of square feet of office space you rent and dividing it by the number of employees you have, you can judge how efficiently you have designed your space. Commercial real estate agents use a general rule of 175–250 square feet of usable office space per employee. 2. Ratio of promoters and detractors Fred Reichheld and his colleagues at Bain & Company and Satmetrix, developed the Net Promoter Score® methodology, which is based around asking customers a single question that is predictive of both repurchase and referral. Here’s how it works: survey your customers and ask them the question “On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to recommend to a friend or colleague?” Figure out what percentage of the people surveyed give you a 9 or 10 and label that your ratio of “promoters.” Calculate your ratio of detractors by figuring out the percentage of people surveyed who gave you a 0–6 score. Then calculate your Net Promoter Score by subtracting your percentage of detractors from your percentage of promoters. The average company in the United States has a Net Promoter Score of between 10 and 15 percent. According to Satmetrix’s 2011 study, the U.S. companies with the highest Net Promoter Score are: USAA Banking 87% Trader Joe’s 82% Wegmans 78% USAA Homeowner’s Insurance 78% Costco 77% USAA Auto Insurance 73% Apple 72% Publix 72% Amazon.com 70% Kohl’s 70% 3. Sales per square foot By measuring your annual sales per square foot, you can get a sense of how efficiently you are translating your real estate into sales. Most industry associations have a benchmark. For example, annual sales per square foot for a respectable retailer might be $300. With real estate usually ranking just behind payroll as a business’s largest expenses, the more sales you can generate per square foot of real estate, the more profitable you are likely to be. Specialty food retailer Trader Joe’s ranks among companies with the highest sales per square foot; Business Week estimates it at $1,750 – more than double that of Whole Foods. 4. Revenue per employee Payroll is the number-one expense of most businesses, which explains why maximizing your revenue per employee can translate quickly to the bottom line. In a 2010 report, Business Insider estimated that Craigslist enjoys one of the highest revenue-per-employee ratios, at $3,300,000 per employee, followed by Google at $1,190,000 per bum in a seat. Amazon was at $1,010,000, Facebook at $920,000, and eBay rounded out the top five at $530,000. More traditional people-dependent companies may struggle to surpass $100,000 per employee. 5. Customers per account manager How many customers do you ask your account managers to manage? Finding a balance can be tricky. Some bankers are forced to juggle more than 400 accounts and therefore do not know each of their customers, whereas some high-end wealth managers may have just 50 clients to stay in contact with. It’s hard to say what the right ratio is because it is so highly dependent on your industry. Slowly increase your ratio of customers per account manager until you see the first signs of deterioration (slowing sales, drop in customer satisfaction). That’s when you know you have probably pushed it a little too far. 6. Prospects per visitor What proportion of your website’s visitors “opt in” by giving you permission to e-mail them in the future? Dr. Karl Blanks and Ben Jesson are the cofounders of Conversion Rate Experts, which advises companies like Google, Apple and Sony how to convert more of their website traffic into customers. Dr. Blanks and Mr. Jesson state that there is no such thing as a typical opt-in rate, because so much depends on the source of traffic. They recommend that rather than benchmarking yourself against a competitor, you benchmark against yourself by carrying out tests to beat your site’s current opt-in rate. Dr. Blanks and Mr. Jesson suggest the easiest way of increasing opt-in rate is to reward visitors for submitting their e-mail addresses by offering them a gift they’d find valuable. Information products – such as online white papers, videos and calculators – make ideal gifts, because their cost per unit can be almost zero. Using this technique and a few others, Conversion Rate Experts achieved a 66 percent increase in the prospects-per-visitor rate for SOS Worldwide, a broker of office space. 7. Prospects to customers Similar to prospects per visitor, another metric to keep an eye on is the efficiency with which you convert prospects – people who have opted in or expressed an interest in what you sell – into customers. Conversion Rate Experts’ Dr. Blanks and Mr. Jesson recommend you monitor the rate at which you are converting qualified prospects into customers, and then carry out tests to identify factors that improve that ratio. Conversion Rate Experts more than doubled the revenues of SEOBook.com , the leading community for search marketers, by converting many of SEOBook’s free subscribers into customers. Techniques that were found to be effective included (perhaps counter intuitively) restricting the number of places available; allowing easier comparison between SEOBook and the alternatives; communicating the company’s value proposition more effectively; and simplifying its sign-up process. The trick is to establish your benchmark and tinker until you can improve it. Acquirers have a healthy appetite for data. The more data you can give them – in the ratio format they’re used to examining – the more attractive your business will be in their eyes.
Share by: