Selling A Business During A Divorce

Information on the process of selling a business during a divorce from an expert.

Mr. Smith owns a few laundromats. He’s owned them for 15 years. He’s been married for 19 years. For a few years now Mr. Smith has thought about selling them. He’s contacted a couple of business brokers and decided First Choice would be his choice if he decided to sell. 


His wife has filed for a divorce, which forces Mr. Smith’s hand.  He now must decide to sell the laundromats or value them and purchase them from his spouse by pay for half of the value. 


We asked Las Vegas divorce attorney Rock Rocheleau to help us and Mr. smith understand Mr. Smith’s options. 


Nevada is a community property state. Which means during a divorce all the property and assets acquired during the marriage are valued and divided evenly.  With a business, like a home, the value can be based on an appraisal or allow the home to be sold. By allowing the business to be sold by a business broker, Mr. Smith is stating the value should be what the market will pay.  This makes for the easiest solution. But what if Mr. Smith wanted to keep the laundromats?

How Do You Determine the Value of a Business?


There are three main approaches used in determining the value of a business: These three approaches are used when the business is not actually being sold in the open market. 


  • Market-Based Approach . Compares the business to other similar businesses that have sold.  Using this data, a value is assigned.  Similar to how a home is appraised or valued. 
  • Asset-Based Approach . The tangible assets of the business are given a fair market value and added up. This is similar to an asset sell of a business except the goodwill of the business or customer base is not considered. 
  • Income-Based Approach . Assesses the present value of the business based future earnings. This is the most common approach.


My first impression is it would be best for Mr. Smith to hire First Choice Business Brokers to sell the business. This way there is no guessing at what the proper value is. But Mr. Smith may want a business to continue running after the divorce. In that case, the common valuation approaches should be reviewed and the best one chosen.


Market Approach to Valuing a Business


The Market Approach uses similar methods that are used by real estate agents when they determine the value of a property. The sale price of other similar businesses that have been recently sold is compared. The evaluator then assigns a fair market value of the community property business based on the price range of similar businesses.

The problem is in finding businesses that have sold that are truly comparable. The selling price for these businesses may have been influenced by unknown factors, such as:


  • The motivation for the sale
  • Market trends
  • The business sold may have been discounted for some unrevealed reason, so the sale is not truly comparable.
  • Other comparisons may not be accurate, such as the size of the business, the number of employees, and annual profits.
  • Intangible assets, or the lack thereof, may have affected the sale
  • There may have been no such similar businesses sold, forcing the evaluator to look for a broader business niche. For example, a business that specifically sells custom mufflers for eco-friendly vehicles may have to be valuated with a broader vehicle parts market. As a result, these valuations could considerably inflate or devalue the businesses’ actual worth.


Because of all these factors, the Market Approach is far from accurate in dividing the community property business between the two spouses during a divorce.


Asset Approach to Valuing a Business


The asset approach method may work well for businesses that have value based on tangible assets like real estate, equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. In the asset approach, an appraiser adds up all the assets and subtracts the liabilities.

Unfortunately, this is not as easy as it sounds. Most businesses have both tangible and intangible assets. An intangible asset refers to things like intellectual property, business contracts, and goodwill. The Asset Approach does not take these factors into account when assigning a value.


For professional practices whose value relies on these intangible assets, the asset approach is usually not the best valuation method.


Income Approach to Valuing a Business


The Income Approach uses different mathematical approaches based on cash flow. The evaluator reviews the history of the specific business and compares its profits to other similar businesses. Risks of failure are also considered. All these mathematical approaches convert expected future profits into a present-day value.


The downside is that the value is based on a prediction rather than the current standing value. It cannot guarantee the assigned value will match the businesses’ future value. This can leave one or both partners shorted in the long term.


For Mr. Smith he should hire an expert to value the business based on the income approach, while at the same time hiring a business broker to look at what the laundromats would sell for on the open market.  This way Mr. Smith can choose which avenue produces the most money for him and his wife to split. 

Recent Articles For You

A Strong Business but a Modest Multiple

By Kim Santos • June 16, 2025
When Sean McAuliffe sold his company, he had a lot going for him. His distribution business was generating nearly $19 million in revenue. Margins were healthy. Growth was solid. And yet, when it came time to sell, his company was valued at around four times EBITDA, a relatively modest value for a $19 million company. The reason? Sean didn’t fully control his supply chain—and buyers noticed. Dependency Makes Buyers Nervous Sean’s model was simple. He bought car key fobs from suppliers in Asia and sold them to locksmiths across the U.S. It was a classic distribution play: source cheap, sell smart, and manage relationships. Sean executed well. He even created his own brand, Keyless to Go, and FCC-registered his products—moves that set him apart from competitors. But despite these efforts, Sean was still reliant on third-party suppliers. He didn’t own the factories. He didn’t control manufacturing. His business was exposed to the decisions of vendors half a world away. In today’s environment—where tariffs and geopolitical tensions can change the cost and availability of overseas goods almost overnight—relying on foreign suppliers feels riskier to acquirers than ever. This kind of dependency is exactly what The Value Builder System™ measures through the Switzerland Structure—one of the eight key drivers of company value. The Switzerland Structure assesses whether your business is overly dependent on any one customer, employee, or supplier. Buyers pay a premium for companies that aren’t beholden to any single relationship. Why Monopoly Control Drives Value Contrast that with businesses that own their brand, control their production, or have proprietary products. Companies with a defendable moat—what we call Monopoly Control—are 40% more likely to have received a written offer to acquire their business, according to analysis of more than 80,000 business owners who have completed their Value Builder Score report. When you control your product and customer experience, you influence your valuation upward—giving buyers fewer reasons to discount your business. The Takeaway for Owners Sean still built a great business. His execution created life-changing wealth. But if he had owned the supply chain or had exclusive manufacturing rights, he likely would have commanded a higher multiple.  The takeaway for business owners: Building a valuable company isn’t just about revenue and profit. It’s about creating a business that can thrive without being dependent on any one customer, employee, or supplier.

How to Double Your Chances of a Premium Acquisition Offer

By Kim Santos • April 21, 2025
Value Builder Analytics, drawing on proprietary data from over 80,000 business owners, found that companies that can run without the owner for at least three months are twice as likely to receive an acquisition offer above 6x EBITDA. The concept is simple. The execution? Not so much. Take Kristie Shifflette for example. She was an early master franchisee with Orangetheory Fitness, a one-hour, coach-led workout that uses heart rate zones to boost calorie burn during and after exercise. When she opened her first location, she did it all—marketing, hiring, payroll, and even handling construction headaches. It worked but only because she was working constantly. As she expanded, things started to break. With two locations, she was stretched. At three, it became clear: The model only worked when Kristie was the model. She knew she needed to change. Kristie stopped focusing on being in the business and started focusing on building the business. From Operator to Owner Kristie started documenting everything. From pre-sale processes to day-to-day studio operations, Kristie developed detailed playbooks that codified exactly how her Orangetheory locations should run—without her. She created a compensation structure for studio managers that gave them ownership over their results: modest base salaries paired with meaningful bonuses tied to net member growth and total revenue. Top-performing managers could double their pay, and they were treated like mini-CEOs with full responsibility for their studio’s performance. By the time she sold her business, Kristie had built a company with 13 locations generating well north of $10 million in annual revenue. Some of her top-performing studios, like the Chapel Hill location, were bringing in revenue of $2 million a year, with EBITDA margins around 40%.  Kristie’s story includes an important lesson: Make yourself less essential, and your business becomes more valuable. If you’re still the one opening the door in the morning and locking up at night—literally or metaphorically—it’s worth asking: What would break if I stepped away for 90 days? Start there. Whether it’s building a playbook, empowering your team, or simply learning to let go, taking even one step toward reducing your involvement makes your company not just more valuable but more enjoyable to own.

Why Imperfections in Your Business Don’t Make It Unsellable

By Kim Santos • April 14, 2025
For business owners considering their endgame, learning what makes a company valuable can feel overwhelming. Buyers prioritize factors like recurring revenue, a differentiated product or service, and a leadership team that operates independently from the owner. If a business doesn’t check every box, it can seem as though selling is perpetually just out of reach. But perfection is not a prerequisite for a sale. While improving the key drivers of value is important, an imperfect business can still be highly desirable to the right buyer. In fact, some acquirers actively look for businesses with fixable flaws because they see an opportunity to increase value. Blake Hutchison on Why Imperfections Can Be to an Acquirer’s Advantage Blake Hutchison, CEO of Flippa, has witnessed thousands of business acquisitions. Flippa is an online marketplace where business owners can buy and sell companies, particularly small to mid-sized digital businesses. The platform connects sellers with buyers looking for opportunities to grow or optimize an acquisition. In a recent Built to Sell Radio interview, Hutchison explained that many business owners assume their company won’t attract buyers because it has shortcomings. In reality, most acquirers aren’t looking for perfection—they’re looking for potential. Many buyers have a strategic advantage, whether it’s a strong distribution network, operational expertise, or access to capital, that allows them to take an imperfect business and make it more valuable. A prime example of this is the acquisition of PetCoach. How PetCoach Turned an Imperfection into a Selling Point PetCoach, co-founded by Brock Weatherup, was a two-sided marketplace designed to connect pet owners with veterinarians. The challenge for any marketplace business is keeping both sides in balance—generating enough demand from pet owners while ensuring there are enough veterinarians to meet that demand. PetCoach had built a strong product, but it lacked a broad distribution channel to acquire pet owners at scale. Without a solution, growth would remain limited. Instead of seeing this as a dealbreaker, Weatherup positioned it as an opportunity for the right buyer. That buyer was Petco. With more than 1,500 locations across the U.S., Mexico, and Puerto Rico, Petco had access to millions of pet owners. By acquiring PetCoach, Petco could instantly expand its offerings while solving PetCoach’s biggest challenge. Weatherup didn’t need to fix the scalability issue before selling. He needed to find an acquirer for whom the business’s weakness was actually a competitive advantage. Your Business Has Value—Even if It’s Not Perfect This doesn’t mean business owners should ignore the fundamentals of value creation. Strengthening factors like recurring revenue, customer retention, and operational efficiency will always increase a company’s attractiveness. However, not every issue needs to be resolved before an exit.  Instead of viewing imperfections as obstacles, business owners should consider how an acquirer might perceive them: A company struggling with customer acquisition may be a great fit for a buyer with an established customer base. A business with inefficient operations might attract an acquirer with expertise in streamlining processes. A company overly dependent on its owner could be appealing to a buyer with a strong leadership team ready to step in. As Blake Hutchison explains, acquirers are often looking for businesses where they can add value. The key is to position the company in a way that highlights its strengths while framing its imperfections as untapped potential. The right acquirer won’t see weaknesses as dealbreakers—they’ll see them as opportunities.